Considering user needs
I’m thinking we can provide a speculative overview without asserting new facts, but it's better to confirm if the user wants specific details. I could ask them for a date or source too. The CLI prefers conciseness, so let's offer two options: a brief explainer about typical agendas and likely implications or tracking verifiable sources. If needed, I might be able to fetch the latest sources with user approval, but it seems asking what they want is the simplest approach.Clarifying user preferences

I plan to ask the user what they specifically want, like a summary, key points, implications, or a timeline. I'll keep my response brief and concise. If they provide a date or link, I can be more precise with my assistance. I’ll also outline the main issues and potential scenarios to add value. Plus, I could suggest specific metrics to monitor, ensuring I cover everything they might need. Let's put this together!
你是想看这次会议的权威要点梳理,还是希望我先做个背景/影响分析?如果有具体时间或来源链接,我可以更精确地提炼结论。
先给你一份可能讨论清单与影响点,方便快速对齐关注焦点:
可能的结果场景(简版):

你希望我:
Copyright 2024 开云(集团)官方网站 - 开云APP官方下载 Kering All Rights by 开云官网